Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) + Core Ultra 5 125H
67/100 median from 3 verified samples · thermal 90/100 · decay 0%
Full combo analysisLast verified 2026-07-19 · authority hub
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) Benchmark Results — All CPU Pairings Tested
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) has been stress-tested in 3 distinct CPU pairings from 14 verified browser samples, with a sample-weighted Sustained Health Score of 60.1/100 (grade C). The strongest measured pairing is Core Ultra 5 125H at 67/100; the weakest is Intel Core Ultra 5 245 at 51/100. Typical sustained-load decay is 18.4% with thermal health around 85/100.
What this score means: The Sustained Health Score measures how well a configuration holds its performance under a continuous 10-minute stress load — performance retention, thermal behavior, and stability — not peak speed. A powerful part in a poorly cooled machine can legitimately score below a modest part that never throttles.
3 measured pairings14 verified samplesMedian-based · outlier-resistant
Sustained health60.1/100C aggregate grade
GPU decay18.4%sustained-load loss
Thermal health85/100fleet average
PT stability97/100path-tracing consistency
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) + Intel Core Ultra 5 245
51/100 median from 3 verified samples · thermal 81/100 · decay 8%
Low sustained-health scores usually indicate throttling or power-limited systems in the sample — not a slow part.
Full combo analysisCitable facts about Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB)
- Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) has been measured in 3 distinct CPU pairings on UserBenchmark.org, totaling 14 verified browser stress-test samples.
- Sample-weighted median Sustained Health Score across all Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) configurations: 60.1/100 (grade C). This score measures performance retention under sustained load, not peak throughput.
- Best measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) + Core Ultra 5 125H at 67/100 from 3 samples.
- Weakest measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) + Intel Core Ultra 5 245 at 51/100 from 3 samples — low scores typically indicate thermal throttling or power-limited systems, not a slow chip.
- Typical sustained-load GPU performance decay: 18.4%. Average thermal health: 85/100. Path-tracing stability: 97/100.
- Per-pairing scores are medians (outlier-resistant); pairings are labeled High (15+ samples), Moderate (5-14) or Low (<5) confidence.
- Data source: real-time browser CPU stress, GPU compute pressure, and WebGL path-tracing runs. License: CC BY 4.0 with attribution to UserBenchmark.org.
Machine-readable version: llm.txt
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB): every tested configuration
Scores are per-pairing medians (outlier-resistant). Decay = CPU-side sustained performance loss. Confidence: High 15+ samples, Moderate 5-14, Low <5.
| # | Configuration | Sustained Health | Grade | Decay | Thermal | Samples | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) | 61/100 | C | 7.4% | 84/100 | 8 | Moderate |
| 2 | Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) | 67/100 | B | 0% | 90/100 | 3 | Low |
| 3 | Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130T GPU (8GB) | 51/100 | C | 8% | 81/100 | 3 | Low |
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Best pairing partner Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has its own hub with every GPU configuration tested.
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H hub →Same GPU does not mean same result.
Cooling, power limits, drivers, RAM speed, and background load change sustained performance. Run your own browser benchmark to measure this exact machine.
Run your personalized benchmark