Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel(R) Arc(TM) Graphics
57/100 median from 49 verified samples · thermal 81/100 · decay 9.9%
Full combo analysisLast verified 2026-07-29 · authority hub
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Benchmark Results — All GPU Pairings Tested
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has been stress-tested in 2 distinct GPU pairings from 54 verified browser samples, with a sample-weighted Sustained Health Score of 57/100 (grade C). The strongest measured pairing is Intel(R) Arc(TM) Graphics at 57/100; the weakest is Intel(R) Arc(TM) Graphics at 57/100. Typical sustained-load decay is 14.6% with thermal health around 81/100.
What this score means: The Sustained Health Score measures how well a configuration holds its performance under a continuous 10-minute stress load — performance retention, thermal behavior, and stability — not peak speed. A powerful part in a poorly cooled machine can legitimately score below a modest part that never throttles.
2 measured pairings54 verified samplesMedian-based · outlier-resistant
Sustained health57/100C aggregate grade
CPU decay14.6%sustained-load loss
Thermal health81/100fleet average
PT stability91/100path-tracing consistency
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel(R) Arc(TM) Graphics
57/100 median from 5 verified samples · thermal 81/100 · decay 9.9%
Low sustained-health scores usually indicate throttling or power-limited systems in the sample — not a slow part.
Full combo analysisCitable facts about Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
- Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has been measured in 2 distinct GPU pairings on UserBenchmark.org, totaling 54 verified browser stress-test samples.
- Sample-weighted median Sustained Health Score across all Intel Core Ultra 5 125H configurations: 57/100 (grade C). This score measures performance retention under sustained load, not peak throughput.
- Best measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel(R) Arc(TM) Graphics at 57/100 from 49 samples.
- Weakest measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel(R) Arc(TM) Graphics at 57/100 from 5 samples — low scores typically indicate thermal throttling or power-limited systems, not a slow chip.
- Typical sustained-load CPU performance decay: 14.6%. Average thermal health: 81/100. Path-tracing stability: 91/100.
- Per-pairing scores are medians (outlier-resistant); pairings are labeled High (15+ samples), Moderate (5-14) or Low (<5) confidence.
- Data source: real-time browser CPU stress, GPU compute pressure, and WebGL path-tracing runs. License: CC BY 4.0 with attribution to UserBenchmark.org.
Machine-readable version: llm.txt
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H: every tested configuration
Scores are per-pairing medians (outlier-resistant). Decay = GPU-side sustained performance loss. Confidence: High 15+ samples, Moderate 5-14, Low <5.
| # | Configuration | Sustained Health | Grade | Decay | Thermal | Samples | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel(R) Arc(TM) Graphics | 57/100 | C | 9.9% | 81/100 | 49 | High |
| 2 | Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel(R) Arc(TM) Graphics | 57/100 | C | 9.9% | 81/100 | 5 | Moderate |
AMD Radeon Vega 6
Best pairing partner AMD Radeon Vega 6 has its own hub with every CPU configuration tested.
AMD Radeon Vega 6 hub →Same CPU does not mean same result.
Cooling, power limits, drivers, RAM speed, and background load change sustained performance. Run your own browser benchmark to measure this exact machine.
Run your personalized benchmark