Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics + Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
67/100 median from 15 verified samples · thermal 93/100 · decay 2.2%
Full combo analysisLast verified 2026-07-26 · authority hub
Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics Benchmark Results — All CPU Pairings Tested
Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics has been stress-tested in 3 distinct CPU pairings from 45 verified browser samples, with a sample-weighted Sustained Health Score of 65.8/100 (grade B). The strongest measured pairing is Intel Core Ultra 7 165H at 67/100; the weakest is Intel Core Ultra 9 185H at 64/100. Typical sustained-load decay is 2% with thermal health around 91/100.
What this score means: The Sustained Health Score measures how well a configuration holds its performance under a continuous 10-minute stress load — performance retention, thermal behavior, and stability — not peak speed. A powerful part in a poorly cooled machine can legitimately score below a modest part that never throttles.
3 measured pairings45 verified samplesMedian-based · outlier-resistant
Sustained health65.8/100B aggregate grade
GPU decay2%sustained-load loss
Thermal health91/100fleet average
PT stability93/100path-tracing consistency
Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics + Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
64/100 median from 6 verified samples · thermal 92/100 · decay 6.5%
Low sustained-health scores usually indicate throttling or power-limited systems in the sample — not a slow part.
Full combo analysisCitable facts about Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics
- Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics has been measured in 3 distinct CPU pairings on UserBenchmark.org, totaling 45 verified browser stress-test samples.
- Sample-weighted median Sustained Health Score across all Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics configurations: 65.8/100 (grade B). This score measures performance retention under sustained load, not peak throughput.
- Best measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics + Intel Core Ultra 7 165H at 67/100 from 15 samples.
- Weakest measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics + Intel Core Ultra 9 185H at 64/100 from 6 samples — low scores typically indicate thermal throttling or power-limited systems, not a slow chip.
- Typical sustained-load GPU performance decay: 2%. Average thermal health: 91/100. Path-tracing stability: 93/100.
- Per-pairing scores are medians (outlier-resistant); pairings are labeled High (15+ samples), Moderate (5-14) or Low (<5) confidence.
- Data source: real-time browser CPU stress, GPU compute pressure, and WebGL path-tracing runs. License: CC BY 4.0 with attribution to UserBenchmark.org.
Machine-readable version: llm.txt
Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics: every tested configuration
Scores are per-pairing medians (outlier-resistant). Decay = CPU-side sustained performance loss. Confidence: High 15+ samples, Moderate 5-14, Low <5.
| # | Configuration | Sustained Health | Grade | Decay | Thermal | Samples | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Core Ultra 7 155H + Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics | 65.5/100 | B | 7.5% | 91/100 | 24 | High |
| 2 | Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics | 67/100 | B | 2.2% | 93/100 | 15 | High |
| 3 | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H + Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics | 64/100 | C | 6.5% | 92/100 | 6 | Moderate |
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Best pairing partner Intel Core Ultra 7 165H has its own hub with every GPU configuration tested.
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H hub →Same GPU does not mean same result.
Cooling, power limits, drivers, RAM speed, and background load change sustained performance. Run your own browser benchmark to measure this exact machine.
Run your personalized benchmark