Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 + Intel Core i7-7700 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz)
58/100 median from 18 verified samples · thermal 90/100 · decay 0%
Full combo analysisLast verified 2026-07-30 · authority hub
Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 Benchmark Results — All CPU Pairings Tested
Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 has been stress-tested in 15 distinct CPU pairings from 185 verified browser samples, with a sample-weighted Sustained Health Score of 55.1/100 (grade C). The strongest measured pairing is Intel Core i7-7700 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz) at 58/100; the weakest is Intel Core i5-7400 Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) at 52/100. Typical sustained-load decay is 14.5% with thermal health around 87/100.
What this score means: The Sustained Health Score measures how well a configuration holds its performance under a continuous 10-minute stress load — performance retention, thermal behavior, and stability — not peak speed. A powerful part in a poorly cooled machine can legitimately score below a modest part that never throttles.
15 measured pairings185 verified samplesMedian-based · outlier-resistant
Sustained health55.1/100C aggregate grade
GPU decay14.5%sustained-load loss
Thermal health87/100fleet average
PT stability91/100path-tracing consistency
Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 + Intel Core i5-7400 Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz)
52/100 median from 7 verified samples · thermal 86/100 · decay 0%
Low sustained-health scores usually indicate throttling or power-limited systems in the sample — not a slow part.
Full combo analysisCitable facts about Intel(R) HD Graphics 630
- Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 has been measured in 15 distinct CPU pairings on UserBenchmark.org, totaling 185 verified browser stress-test samples.
- Sample-weighted median Sustained Health Score across all Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 configurations: 55.1/100 (grade C). This score measures performance retention under sustained load, not peak throughput.
- Best measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 + Intel Core i7-7700 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz) at 58/100 from 18 samples.
- Weakest measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 + Intel Core i5-7400 Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) at 52/100 from 7 samples — low scores typically indicate thermal throttling or power-limited systems, not a slow chip.
- Typical sustained-load GPU performance decay: 14.5%. Average thermal health: 87/100. Path-tracing stability: 91/100.
- Per-pairing scores are medians (outlier-resistant); pairings are labeled High (15+ samples), Moderate (5-14) or Low (<5) confidence.
- Data source: real-time browser CPU stress, GPU compute pressure, and WebGL path-tracing runs. License: CC BY 4.0 with attribution to UserBenchmark.org.
Machine-readable version: llm.txt
Intel(R) HD Graphics 630: every tested configuration
Scores are per-pairing medians (outlier-resistant). Decay = CPU-side sustained performance loss. Confidence: High 15+ samples, Moderate 5-14, Low <5.
Intel Core i7-7700 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz)
Best pairing partner Intel Core i7-7700 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz) has its own hub with every GPU configuration tested.
Intel Core i7-7700 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz) hub →Same GPU does not mean same result.
Cooling, power limits, drivers, RAM speed, and background load change sustained performance. Run your own browser benchmark to measure this exact machine.
Run your personalized benchmark