Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB) + Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
68.5/100 median from 9 verified samples · thermal 95/100 · decay 0%
Full combo analysisLast verified 2026-07-17 · authority hub
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB) Benchmark Results — All CPU Pairings Tested
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB) has been stress-tested in 2 distinct CPU pairings from 12 verified browser samples, with a sample-weighted Sustained Health Score of 67.4/100 (grade B). The strongest measured pairing is Intel Core Ultra 9 285K at 68.5/100; the weakest is Intel Core Ultra 7 265 at 64/100. Typical sustained-load decay is 2.4% with thermal health around 95/100.
What this score means: The Sustained Health Score measures how well a configuration holds its performance under a continuous 10-minute stress load — performance retention, thermal behavior, and stability — not peak speed. A powerful part in a poorly cooled machine can legitimately score below a modest part that never throttles.
2 measured pairings12 verified samplesMedian-based · outlier-resistant
Sustained health67.4/100B aggregate grade
GPU decay2.4%sustained-load loss
Thermal health95/100fleet average
PT stability85/100path-tracing consistency
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB) + Intel Core Ultra 7 265
64/100 median from 3 verified samples · thermal 94/100 · decay 2.1%
Low sustained-health scores usually indicate throttling or power-limited systems in the sample — not a slow part.
Full combo analysisCitable facts about Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB)
- Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB) has been measured in 2 distinct CPU pairings on UserBenchmark.org, totaling 12 verified browser stress-test samples.
- Sample-weighted median Sustained Health Score across all Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB) configurations: 67.4/100 (grade B). This score measures performance retention under sustained load, not peak throughput.
- Best measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB) + Intel Core Ultra 9 285K at 68.5/100 from 9 samples.
- Weakest measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB) + Intel Core Ultra 7 265 at 64/100 from 3 samples — low scores typically indicate thermal throttling or power-limited systems, not a slow chip.
- Typical sustained-load GPU performance decay: 2.4%. Average thermal health: 95/100. Path-tracing stability: 85/100.
- Per-pairing scores are medians (outlier-resistant); pairings are labeled High (15+ samples), Moderate (5-14) or Low (<5) confidence.
- Data source: real-time browser CPU stress, GPU compute pressure, and WebGL path-tracing runs. License: CC BY 4.0 with attribution to UserBenchmark.org.
Machine-readable version: llm.txt
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB): every tested configuration
Scores are per-pairing medians (outlier-resistant). Decay = CPU-side sustained performance loss. Confidence: High 15+ samples, Moderate 5-14, Low <5.
| # | Configuration | Sustained Health | Grade | Decay | Thermal | Samples | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB) | 68.5/100 | B | 0% | 95/100 | 9 | Moderate |
| 2 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140T GPU (32GB | 64/100 | C | 2.1% | 94/100 | 3 | Low |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Best pairing partner Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has its own hub with every GPU configuration tested.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K hub →Same GPU does not mean same result.
Cooling, power limits, drivers, RAM speed, and background load change sustained performance. Run your own browser benchmark to measure this exact machine.
Run your personalized benchmark