Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) + Intel Core Ultra 5 238V
72/100 median from 6 verified samples · thermal 95/100 · decay 6.7%
Full combo analysisLast verified 2026-07-28 · authority hub
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) Benchmark Results — All CPU Pairings Tested
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) has been stress-tested in 4 distinct CPU pairings from 41 verified browser samples, with a sample-weighted Sustained Health Score of 68.8/100 (grade B). The strongest measured pairing is Intel Core Ultra 5 238V at 72/100; the weakest is Intel Core Ultra 5 228V at 67/100. Typical sustained-load decay is 0.3% with thermal health around 93/100.
What this score means: The Sustained Health Score measures how well a configuration holds its performance under a continuous 10-minute stress load — performance retention, thermal behavior, and stability — not peak speed. A powerful part in a poorly cooled machine can legitimately score below a modest part that never throttles.
4 measured pairings41 verified samplesMedian-based · outlier-resistant
Sustained health68.8/100B aggregate grade
GPU decay0.3%sustained-load loss
Thermal health93/100fleet average
PT stability94/100path-tracing consistency
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) + Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
67/100 median from 23 verified samples · thermal 93/100 · decay 1.9%
Low sustained-health scores usually indicate throttling or power-limited systems in the sample — not a slow part.
Full combo analysisCitable facts about Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB)
- Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) has been measured in 4 distinct CPU pairings on UserBenchmark.org, totaling 41 verified browser stress-test samples.
- Sample-weighted median Sustained Health Score across all Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) configurations: 68.8/100 (grade B). This score measures performance retention under sustained load, not peak throughput.
- Best measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) + Intel Core Ultra 5 238V at 72/100 from 6 samples.
- Weakest measured pairing (min 5 samples): Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) + Intel Core Ultra 5 228V at 67/100 from 23 samples — low scores typically indicate thermal throttling or power-limited systems, not a slow chip.
- Typical sustained-load GPU performance decay: 0.3%. Average thermal health: 93/100. Path-tracing stability: 94/100.
- Per-pairing scores are medians (outlier-resistant); pairings are labeled High (15+ samples), Moderate (5-14) or Low (<5) confidence.
- Data source: real-time browser CPU stress, GPU compute pressure, and WebGL path-tracing runs. License: CC BY 4.0 with attribution to UserBenchmark.org.
Machine-readable version: llm.txt
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB): every tested configuration
Scores are per-pairing medians (outlier-resistant). Decay = CPU-side sustained performance loss. Confidence: High 15+ samples, Moderate 5-14, Low <5.
| # | Configuration | Sustained Health | Grade | Decay | Thermal | Samples | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) | 67/100 | B | 1.9% | 93/100 | 23 | High |
| 2 | Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB | 70/100 | B | 6.3% | 92/100 | 9 | Moderate |
| 3 | Intel Core Ultra 5 238V + Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) | 72/100 | B | 6.7% | 95/100 | 6 | Moderate |
| 4 | Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel(R) Arc(TM) 130V GPU (8GB) | 73/100 | B | 0.5% | 98/100 | 3 | Low |
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V
Best pairing partner Intel Core Ultra 5 238V has its own hub with every GPU configuration tested.
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V hub →Same GPU does not mean same result.
Cooling, power limits, drivers, RAM speed, and background load change sustained performance. Run your own browser benchmark to measure this exact machine.
Run your personalized benchmark